Published on August 14, 2026
\"Thou Art Good, and Doest Good\": The Hebrew of Psalm 119:68 — and the Funeral Where George Müller Preached It
A quote about faith circulates everywhere under George Müller's name, and it cannot be sourced. What he actually said is harder, better documented, and rests on two Hebrew words most readers pass over.
You have probably seen the line, printed over a sunrise: "Faith is not believing that God will do what you want. It is believing that God will do what is best." It is attributed, almost every time, to George Müller.
It is a good sentence. But if you go looking for where he said it — in the autobiography, in the narratives, in the collected letters — you will not find it. What you will find is that Müller said something much harder than that, out loud, standing over his wife's coffin.
Short answer: That popular quote cannot be traced to any of Müller's own writings; it appears to be a modern paraphrase. What is documented is his funeral sermon for his wife Mary in February 1870, preached from Psalm 119:68, "Thou art good, and doest good." The Hebrew there is tov attah u-metiv — an adjective for "good" followed by a causative participle from yatab (H3190), so the line reads closer to "good You are, and doing-good." Not a quality God possesses. An action He is in the middle of.
First, the quote
We are not going to build an article on a sentence nobody can source, even one this good. That is the same standard we apply to Hebrew and Greek claims in the pillar guide: if a statement carries a name and quotation marks, someone should be able to open a book and find it.
Searching Müller's own material and the standard collections turns up no such sentence. It reads like a modern compression of his theology rather than his voice — his actual prose is plainer, slower, and more given to saying "the Lord" where a modern writer would say "God." So: a fair summary of what he believed, almost certainly not a quotation. If you want to use it, use it as a paraphrase without the quotation marks.
That is not a loss. What he did say is on record, and it is not a sentence you would print over a sunrise.
What Müller actually said
Mary Müller died on 6 February 1870, after thirty-nine years of marriage. George Müller preached at her funeral himself. His text was Psalm 119:68 — "Thou art good, and doest good" — and he built the sermon on three points:
> The Lord was good, and did good, in giving her to me. > > The Lord was good, and did good, in so long leaving her to me. > > The Lord was good, and did good, in taking her from me.
He had already said, during her illness, "The Lord is good, and doeth good; all will be according to His own blessed character. Nothing but that which is good, like Himself, can proceed from Him. If He pleases to take my dearest wife, it will be good, like Himself. What I have to do, as His child, is to be satisfied with what my Father does, that I may glorify Him." And afterward, plainly: "I am satisfied with God."
Some twelve hundred orphans stood at that burial. The man saying the third point out loud was the man who had lost the most in the room.
(Source: Autobiography of George Müller, or A Million and a Half in Answer to Prayer, compiled by G. Fred. Bergin, with a concluding chapter by Arthur T. Pierson, 4th ed., London: Pickering & Inglis, 1929.)
The two Hebrew words he chose
Psalm 119:68 in Hebrew is four words, and the first two are the ones that carry the weight:
טוֹב־אַתָּה וּמֵטִיב — tov attah u-metiv.
Tov (H2895 / H2896) is the ordinary Hebrew word for good — the word God speaks over the light in Genesis 1:4 and over the whole finished creation in Genesis 1:31. Here it is an adjective describing God Himself: good — You.
Then the second word turns. Metiv is a participle of yatab (H3190), and Strong's defines that root with the causative built in: to make good, to do well. Brown-Driver-Briggs opens its entry at "be good, well, glad, pleasing," and the form used here is the Hiphil — the Hebrew stem that means to cause something to happen. So u-metiv is not a second adjective. It is a verb in motion: doing-good, and as a participle, doing it continuously rather than once.
Put together, the line says something the English "Thou art good, and doest good" almost manages: God is good, and God is currently in the act of causing good. The verse does not offer a description of God's character to admire from a distance. It claims He is doing something, right now, while you read it.
That is a distinction worth holding carefully, because it can be overstated. Hebrew participles do not always mean "at this very instant" — context decides, and the psalm is making a general confession about God, not a report on the last five minutes. But the choice of a causative verb over a second adjective is real, and it is visible in any interlinear.
The detail almost nobody mentions
Psalm 119 is an acrostic. It runs through the Hebrew alphabet in twenty-two stanzas of eight verses each, and every verse inside a stanza begins with that stanza's letter.
Verse 68 sits in the ninth stanza, verses 65 to 72 — the stanza of the letter ט (teth).
And tov begins with teth.
So the psalmist, handed a letter, reaches for "good" and does not let go: tov or its forms appear six times across those eight verses. Verse 65, "Thou hast dealt well with thy servant." Verse 66, "Teach me good judgment." Verse 68, twice, the line Müller preached. Verse 71. Verse 72. The one stanza in the Psalter alphabetically anchored to the word "good" is saturated with it.
Here is where honesty matters more than the effect. You will sometimes read that every verse in this stanza begins with the word tov. That is not so — verse 67 begins with terem ("before"), verses 69 and 70 with other teth words. Six occurrences across eight verses is remarkable enough without inflating it, and inflating it is exactly the habit this site exists to correct.
Now read what the stanza actually says around verse 68:
> Verse 67: "Before I was afflicted I went astray: but now have I kept thy word." > > Verse 71: "It is good for me that I have been afflicted; that I might learn thy statutes."
Verse 71 opens with tov. The psalmist takes the same word he has just applied to God and lays it on his own suffering. Whether Müller had the stanza's structure in view when he chose his text, we do not know — he does not say. But he did not choose a verse that floats above pain. He chose one embedded in a passage that says, twice, that affliction did something no comfortable season had managed.
What this does and does not claim
It would be easy, and cruel, to flatten this into "everything that happens to you is good." The text is more careful than that, and so should we be.
Psalm 119:68 says God is good and does good. Verse 71 says the affliction was good for me — and it names the outcome it has in view, "that I might learn thy statutes." That is not the same as calling the loss itself a good thing. Joseph draws the same line in Genesis 50:20 without blurring it: "ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good." The evil stays evil in that sentence. What changes is who has the last word over it.
Müller's third point is the one people quote and the one they should sit with longest. He did not say his wife's death was a good thing. He said the Lord was good, and did good, in taking her — that the God acting in that moment was not a different God from the one who gave her thirty-nine years earlier. That is a claim about the character of the actor, not a verdict on the pleasantness of the act.
And it is why the sourced Müller is stronger than the unsourced one. "God will do what is best" can be said by someone who has lost nothing. "The Lord was good, and did good, in taking her from me" can only be said by someone standing where he was standing.
How to check this yourself
Take the five steps from the pillar guide: find the Strong's number for the exact word in the exact verse, read the gloss as a hypothesis rather than a definition, read the other occurrences, check a real lexicon, and then say plainly how sure you are. For this article, that meant looking up H2895 and H3190, checking the Hiphil form in an interlinear, counting tov in verses 65 to 72 rather than trusting a summary of them — and, before any of that, trying and failing to source a quotation.
We are assembling ninety studies like this one — verse, Strong's number, root, cross-references and a practice for each — into a Hebrew and Greek Word Study Workbook. Until it is ready, start with the free downloads, or read a new word study every day in word studies.
Frequently asked questions
Did George Müller say "faith is not believing God will do what you want, but that God will do what is best"?
There is no known source for that sentence in Müller's own writings, and it does not appear in the standard collections of his material. It is best treated as a modern paraphrase of his theology rather than a quotation. What is documented is his funeral sermon for his wife Mary in 1870, preached from Psalm 119:68, in which he said the Lord was good and did good in giving her, in leaving her so long, and in taking her away.
What does "Thou art good, and doest good" mean in Hebrew?
The Hebrew of Psalm 119:68 is tov attah u-metiv. Tov (H2895/H2896) is the common word for good, used of the light in Genesis 1:4 and of creation in Genesis 1:31. Metiv is a Hiphil participle of yatab (H3190), a root Strong's defines causatively as to make good or do well. The line therefore pairs an adjective with a verb in motion: God is good, and God is doing good, not merely possessing goodness as a trait.
What is yatab (H3190) in Hebrew?
Yatab is a Hebrew verb meaning to be good, well or pleasing, and in the causative Hiphil stem, to do good or make something good. Brown-Driver-Briggs opens the entry at "be good, well, glad, pleasing." In Psalm 119:68 it appears as the participle metiv, which is why translations render it as an action — "doest good" — rather than a second description of God's character.
Why is Psalm 119:68 in a stanza full of the word "good"?
Psalm 119 is an alphabetic acrostic of twenty-two stanzas, and verses 65 to 72 form the stanza of the letter teth. The Hebrew word tov begins with teth, so the psalmist returns to it repeatedly — six occurrences across those eight verses, in 65, 66, 68 (twice), 71 and 72. Note that not every verse in the stanza begins with the word tov; verse 67 begins with terem, "before." The concentration is real, but it is often overstated.
Does Psalm 119:71 mean suffering itself is good?
The verse says, "It is good for me that I have been afflicted; that I might learn thy statutes," and the second half names the outcome it has in view. It claims the affliction produced something valuable, not that the affliction was a good thing in itself. Genesis 50:20 keeps the same distinction: "ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good," where the evil remains evil and God's purpose overrules it.